Knaph

Validity

An argument is valid when its conclusion must be true if its reasons are true. It is about the shape of the argument, not whether the reasons are true.

Depth 1 · Foundation

You can test whether a conclusion follows by pretending the reasons are true and trying to imagine it false, and you know validity is about shape, not facts.

Sign in to prove what you know with a short quiz, see how deep you've gone, and earn XP for it.

Sign in with Google

Depths of understanding

  1. 1

    Foundation

    You can test whether a conclusion follows by pretending the reasons are true and trying to imagine it false, and you know validity is about shape, not facts.

  2. 2

    Deeper

    You recognize valid and invalid argument forms - like modus ponens and affirming the consequent - by their shape.

Your path here

What's still between you and Validity, depth 1, in the order you can learn it.

  1. 1ClaimDepth 1 · Foundation · Logic
  2. 2ArgumentDepth 1 · Foundation · Logic
  3. 3ValidityDepth 1 · Foundation · Logic

Where it fits