Knaph

Conditional statements

"If... then" claims about a link: whenever the if part happens, the then part does too. One is broken only when the if part is true and the then part false - so a wet street doesn't prove it rained.

Depth 1 · Foundation

You know an if-then claim is broken only when the if part happens without the then part, and that from it "the then part didn't happen" follows backwards but "the then part happened" doesn't.

Sign in to prove what you know with a short quiz, see how deep you've gone, and earn XP for it.

Sign in with Google

Depths of understanding

  1. 1

    Foundation

    You know an if-then claim is broken only when the if part happens without the then part, and that from it "the then part didn't happen" follows backwards but "the then part happened" doesn't.

  2. 2

    Deeper

    "If not the then part, then not the if part" (the contrapositive) says the same thing as the original, and the converse doesn't.

    Master depth 1 first

Your path here

What's still between you and Conditional statements, depth 1, in the order you can learn it.

  1. 1ClaimDepth 1 · Foundation · Logic
  2. 2ArgumentDepth 1 · Foundation · Logic
  3. 3Conditional statementsDepth 1 · Foundation · Logic

Where it fits

Makes these deeper

Once you know Conditional statements, come back to these — they'll mean more.